In supervised machine learning, *testing* (or *inference*) is the process of evaluating a trained model's ability to make accurate predictions on new, unseen data. During this phase, the model is given data points with *features* (inputs like size or color) but without the labels it was trained on. The model uses the patterns it learned during training to predict the labels for this data. The results are then compared to the actual labels (if available) to measure the model's performance using metrics like accuracy or precision. Inference is the final application of the model to make real-world predictions.

Features are observable and measurable properties or characteristics used to describe data in both machine learning and human experience. 

Supervised learning parallels human learning through its reliance on guidance from labeled examples, similar to how humans learn with feedback. For instance, when a child learns to identify objects, they receive input (the object) and a corresponding label (e.g., "dog" or "apple") from a teacher or parent. Mistakes are corrected, reinforcing the connection between input and label, much like how supervised learning algorithms adjust their predictions based on errors.

Binary classifiers are evaluated by comparing their predictions to the actual outcomes using a confusion matrix. This is a table with four categories: True Positives (TP), where the classifier correctly predicts a positive outcome; True Negatives (TN), where it correctly predicts a negative outcome; False Positives (FP), where it wrongly predicts a positive; and False Negatives (FN), where it misses a positive case. Metrics like accuracy (overall correctness), precision (focus on positives), and recall (how well positives are found) are calculated from this matrix, helping to assess the classifier’s performance.